« Milwaukee and Chicago: One City or Two? | Main | Vacation Time »

Wednesday, June 20, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Your summation of the Indiana law ("banning workers from paying union dues if they choose not to belong to a union") is a little off.

The law bans mandatory union membership requirements in association with employment: it bans "closed shops". Workers who do not join the union cannot be forced to pay union dues (as is the case in a "closed shop").

I don't think there's evidence that Gov. Daniels "led" the Indiana legislature's "right to work" effort. I think he was on record as opposing the Republican majority's pursuit of divisive "social" issues like "right to work", de-funding Planned Parenthood, and the constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Apparently the one group that doesn't care much for public sector unions is union members themselves. Some Wisconsin unions lost over 50% of their membership after the state law change that disallowed closed shops.

A note on closed shops: the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 banned the closed shop in the United States. Right-to-work laws prohibit what are called "union security" clauses in collective bargaining agreements. Under a union security clause, workers must either join the union that represents their workplace and pay full dues, or decline to join and pay a percentage of full dues as a fee that covers the cost of representation, since both members and nonmembers are legally entitled to representation if they are in a group of workers represented by a union (a "bargaining unit"). So, in a right to work state, all places represented by a union become "open shops", in which workers either join the union and pay dues, or decline to join and pay nothing.

This is different from a closed shop, in which a worker must join a union as a condition of employment.

Aaron Renn points out that some public sector unions in Wisconsin showed significant declines in membership, but there's a couple of important contextual factors:

1. Dues are no longer automatically deducted from workers' paychecks, so those unions are probably still going around trying to collect dues - we'll probably see some fluctuation in membership for a while.

2. The scope of what Wisconsin public sector unions can negotiate in collective bargaining has been sharply curtailed. That might be a factor in a worker's decision to remain a member.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog powered by Typepad