For Midwesterners viewing the post-industrial collapse of their region's economy, one big question has to be: how do the Germans do it?
Germany has all the ingredients of a Midwestern-style economic catastrophe -- a reliance on heavy industry, big health and pension costs, especially unionized workers. Partly because of the unions, Germany has those "rigid labor markets" that have convinced a generation of American economists that the German economy is doomed to obsolescence.
So, once again: how do the Germans do it? German industry is booming and, unlike American industry, it's still in Germany. The global recession, being global, has hit Germany, too, but unemployment there now is 7.6 percent -- not great, but a lot better than the American rate of 9.5 percent. Unemployment among young people aged 16 to 24 in Germany is 10.5 percent. Again, not great. But the U.S. youth jobless rate is 26 percent, which amounts to the economic massacre of a generation.
German labor costs and social costs -- all those pension and health programs -- are high. Its currency, the euro, also is high. This means it should be uncompetitive on world markets, leading to a big trade deficit -- right? Wrong. Germany, as usual, runs a trade surplus and that surplus ($98.7 billion so far this year) is actually up 26% over last year. Meanwhile, the United States, as everybody knows, runs a trade deficit and that deficit in the first five months of this year is up 37%, to $197 billion, over last year. (Don't blame it on on China: $12 billion of that U.S. deficit is with supposedly uncompetitive Germany.)
So yet once again: how do the Germans do it? A new book just out tries to tell how. The answer is not that the German succeed despite their heavy industry, their high costs and their unions. It's that they succeed just because of all those supposed handicaps, including unions.